My new book, the Internet, Warts and All, has just been published. The subtitle – Free Speech, Privacy and Truth – gives and indication of its subject matter and scope: this is a wide-ranging, broad-brush book covering a great variety of different subjects, from some of the theoretical background to free speech, privacy and truth to specific subjects – there’s a chapter on surveillance, another on trolling, and one whose main subject is fake news.
The idea for the book originally came to an extent out of frustration: why are governments so bad at dealing with the internet? Why are their laws so often counterproductive, their policies incoherent, and their politicians’ speeches so full of rubbish? Why is it so difficult for people to see the consequences of their ideas – things like ‘real names’ policies or demanding back-doors for encryption? Why do they think it would be easy for tech companies to ‘deal’ with trolls if only they put enough effort into it? It isn’t only governments of course – the media, academia and the technology industry itself is often just as guilty.
The Internet, Warts and All attempts to cut through some of this. The basic premise is that we need to be better at seeing the bigger picture – and understanding that the messy, flawed, confusing and paradoxical nature of the internet is not something that can be ‘sorted out’ by more law or more effort. It’s part of how things work. It’s a strength of the internet, not a weakness.
The Internet, Warts and All is to a great extent intended as a ‘myth-busting’ book – many of the chapters take common assumptions about their subjects head on, from broad ideas like the permanence of material on the net and the ‘balance’ to be found between privacy and security (spoiler: it’s not a balance) to specifics such as the ‘organic’ or ‘neutral’ nature of Google search or Facebook’s ‘platform’. Some of the examples used may be quite familiar – laws like the Investigatory Powers Act, the trolling tale of GamerGate, the farrago that was the NHS’s care.data – others less so, such as the mess that was Samaritans Radar and the tragic story of Brenda Leyland. They will, however, demonstrate that what is being discussed in the book isn’t just academic theory, but an observation of the reality of the internet as it is, and something about why that matters.
By its nature, The Internet, Warts and All, is very broad-brush, but it points to some of the excellent work done by academics in particular areas – researching the book has led me to read and appreciate the work of many great scholars even more.
The book is published by Cambridge University Press, and can be found here: http://admin.cambridge.org/academic/subjects/law/intellectual-property/internet-warts-and-all-free-speech-privacy-and-truth
I shall be talking about the book – or at least some aspects of the book on a number of occasions in September:
Informally, at the SLS conference at QMUL (Sept 5-7)
At the wonderful GiKii in Vienna (Sept 13)
At New Scientist Live at the Excel Centre in London, on Sept 21st https://live.newscientist.com/speakers/paul-bernal
At a public lecture for The Register at the Rugby Tavern, London, on Sept 27th https://www.theregister.co.uk/AMP/2018/08/13/the_register_lecture_accepting_the_internet_warts_and_all_trailer_2
I hope at least some of these will be interesting – and I probably won’t be able to stop myself talking about the book on many more occasions.
Sounds interesting but I was horrified to see the price on Amazon; £72.68! I want to read it in my retirement cottage but will be waiting a while it seems.
Yes, sorry about that – it’s standard pricing for an academic book with CUP. I’m trying to persuade them to release a reasonably priced paperback, but it hasn’t worked yet!
Congratulations on the new baby!
I shall be sending you my draft presentation for next Monday at seminar in Naypyidaw on developing a rights respecting legal and policy framework cybersecurity for Myanmar. And some interesting questions, please, for the panel I am chairing at Myanmar Connect next month called ‘Does the internet have a conscience?’
Thanks! I’m back from holiday in a couple of weeks…. will have a think!
Reblogged this on sdbast.
The widow in the parable did finally get justice contrary to the
unjust judge by being persistent — being bothersome.
Basically, it’s all about meeting your fears and facing them head-on. For
most of us, irritation usually involves people. http://ngupewhiwato.mihanblog.com/post/4
Hi,
Congrats Paul!
Just finished your stimulating work Data gathering, surveillance and human rights:
recasting the debate and I would love to read your new book asap.
Good luck!
All the best,
Lucas
Thanks! I hope you get the chance – and that you enjoy it!